Annie Dillard on Difference between Natural and Artificial Obvious
According to Dillard, there is a difference between the “natural obvious” and the “artificial obvious”. Everyone can see the natural obvious as it comes with even a sensory glance. The artificial obvious is how a person interprets and comprehends the natural obvious to make a meaningful whole. Dillard says that people have no idea of space whatsoever. If they did, they may be able to form their artificial obvious. In this case, Dillard also quotes an experiment linking it with the sensation of color.
The Sensation of Color
According to Dillard, the sensation of color is bombarded towards eyes, asking people to make sense of what they see. The artificial obvious is likely to be formed through the sensation of color coming towards our eyes.
Moreover, seeing for Dillard is also verbalization. That is, a person sees what he or she is able to describe and explain. Without verbalization, there can be no real seeing. People will infer from seeing due to your verbalization. “The tremendous size of the world” (p. 6), as put by Dillard, makes it important to verbalize. Otherwise, the humans and the animals alike will be confused about what they see. Verbalization then becomes an important activity in the domain
of seeing, portraying as if seeing is not complete without the process of verbalization. Unfortunately, as Dillard points out, not every individual makes the effort of verbalization.